##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Semen quality may be affected by several genetic and environmental factors. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of age on semen quality, kinematic properties, and frozen semen production potentialities of Red Chittagong Cattle (RCC) bulls. Eighty-eight (88) ejaculates from 12 breeding bulls (4 bull/group) of RCC breed were used in this experiment. The bulls were categorized into three groups based on their age (Group 1: 2.5-4.0 years, Group 2: 4.0-6.0 years, Group 3: 6.0- 8.0 years). Semen was collected once/week regularly in the early morning (6-6.30 AM) with an AV set. Different motility, morphology, and kinematic properties of sperm were evaluated by Computer Assisted Sperm Analyzer (CASA). One-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's multiple range post-test was used to assess differences among the mean using SPSS (25.0) software. Bull age has no significant effects on semen volume and concentration. Although a higher volume was found for group 3 (4.36±1.00) followed by group 2 (4.13±1.28) and group 1 (4.02±1.00). Sperm concentration increases with the increase of bull age. There were no significant differences found (p>0.05) for none of the motility parameters in fresh and frozen RCC bull semen irrespective of age. Significantly higher distal droplet (%) was observed for older bulls followed by group 2 and group 1 bulls. All breeding bulls irrespective of their age have more than two folds higher proximal droplet % than the normal value. Bull age has no significant difference in sperm kinematics and dose/ejaculates (p>0.05). With the increasing age of the bull, the number of dose/ejaculates (418.91±166.11 in group-3 vs. 384.75±137.33 in group-1) increases. In this experimental condition, RCC breeding bulls can be used for breeding purposes for up to 8 years with similar efficiency as a younger bull if the bulls have proper physical fitness for mounting and semen collection. 

References

  1. Islam S, Kabir MA, Miraz MFH, Tamanna EJ, Sarker SR, Islam Z, Hossain SMJ, Hossain S, Deb GK. Investigation of Ovarian Follicular Waves and Major Hormonal Profile in Red Chittagong Cattle. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 2020; 11, 7-21.
     Google Scholar
  2. Bhakat M, Mohanty TK, Raina VS, Gupta AK, Khan HM, Mahapatra RK, Sarkar M. Effect of age and season on semen quality parameters in Sahiwal bulls. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2011; 43:1161–1168.
     Google Scholar
  3. Kumar A, Singh P, Bhakat M, Singh S, Nitharwal K, Gupta AK. Effect of feed energy levels on semen quality and freezability of young murrah buffalo bulls. Buffalo Bulletin, 2017; 36(2), 415–426.
     Google Scholar
  4. Murphy EM, Kelly AK, O’Meara C, Eivers B, Lonergan P, Fair S. Influence of bull age, ejaculate number, and season of collection on semen production and sperm motility parameters in Holstein Friesian bulls in a commercial artificial insemination Centre. Journal of Animal Science, 2018; 96(6), 2408–2418.
     Google Scholar
  5. Tyagi S, Mandal DK, Kumar M, Mathur AK. Reproductive wastage rate of crossbred dairy bulls with reference to level of exotic inheritance and number of breed components. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction, 2006; 27, 27-30.
     Google Scholar
  6. Kumi-Diaka J, Nagerathman V, Rwuaan J. Seasonal, age- related changes in semen quality and testicular morphology of bulls in tropics. Vterinary Research, 1981; 108: 13-15.
     Google Scholar
  7. Walton, A. The Technique of Artificial Insemination, 2nd ed. London: Holborn Surgical Instrument Co. 1945.
     Google Scholar
  8. Miraz MFH, Deb GK, Hossain SMJ, Akter S. Motion characteristics and plasma integrity evaluation of Murrah buffalo semen. Asian Australasian Journal of Bioscience and Biotechnology, 2022; 7 (2), 75-81.
     Google Scholar
  9. Ahmed KU, Islam MR, Talukder MKU, Rahman Z, Hossain MM, Bhuiyan MMU. Influence of breed, age and collection interval of semen quality of AI dairy bulls in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Research Publications Journal, 2014; 10(3) 275-282.
     Google Scholar
  10. Kiani FA, Yousaf A, Zafar MA, Nawaz M, Akbar Z, Sohoo MR. Effect of age on Physical Characteristics of Kundhi Buffalo Bull Semen. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 2014; 3(11):445-453.
     Google Scholar
  11. Brito LFC, Silva AED, Rodrigues LH, Vieira FV, Deragon LAG, Kastelic JP. Effects of environmental factors, age and genotype on sperm production and semen quality in Bos indicus and Bos Taurus AI bulls in Brazil. Animal Reproduction Science,2002; 70:181-190.
     Google Scholar
  12. Mathevon M, Buhr MM, Dekkers JCM. Environmental, management and genetic factors affecting semen production in Holstein bulls. Journal of Dairy Science. 1998a; 81: 3321-3330.
     Google Scholar
  13. Pardede BP, Supriatna I, Yudi Y, Agil M. Decreased bull fertility: age-related changes in sperm motility and DNA fragmentation. E3S Web of Conferences, 2020; 151, 01010.
     Google Scholar
  14. Zewdie E, Deneke N, FikreMariam D. Guidelines and procedures on bovine semen production. Addis Ababa: NAIC. 2005.
     Google Scholar
  15. Budiyanto A, Arif M, Alfons MPW, Fani RT, Hafid AF, Wicaksono B, Insani KM, Herdinta M. The Effect of age and breed on the quality of bull Semen in the regional artificial insemination center. Acta Veterinaria Indonesiana, 2021; Special Issues: 132-136.
     Google Scholar
  16. Hafez ESE. Reproduction in Farm Animals. 6th Edition, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1993; 405-439.
     Google Scholar
  17. Perry VEA. The Role of Sperm Morphology Standards in the Laboratory Assessment of Bull Fertility in Australia. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2021; 8:672058.
     Google Scholar
  18. Meistrich ML, Trostle-Weige PK, Russell LD. Abnormal manchette development in spermatids of azh/azh mutant mice. American Journal of Anatomy, 1990; 188:74–86. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001880109 53.
     Google Scholar
  19. Kysilka C. Bull seminal vesicle hemolytic factor. A new phospholipid-binding protein. Federation of European Biochemical Societies letter, 1975; 56:202–4.
     Google Scholar
  20. Hossain SMJ, Miraz MFH, Akter S, Ali MY, Deb GK. Comparative Study on Semen Quality and Fertility of Red Chittagong Cattle, BCB1 and Munshiganj Bulls of Bangladesh. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 2022; 13, 428-441.
     Google Scholar
  21. Isnaini N, Harsis T, Zamani WR. The effect of age on semen freezability of Swamp Buffalo bull in a commercial artificial insemination center. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan, 2019; 29(3): 266-270.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)